Royals Authority - A Kansas City Royals Blog
Royals Decline Options on Crisp and Olivo
Written by Craig Brown   
Friday, 06 November 2009 13:33

From the official release:

The Kansas City Royals have declined 2010 options for outfielder Coco Crisp, catcher Miguel Olivo and right-handed pitcher Yasuhiko Yabuta.  Crisp and Olivo are now eligible to file for free agency.  Yabuta can elect free agency if he doesn’t sign a 2010 Major League contract with the Royals by November 16.

If the Royals had picked up Crisp's option for 2010, he would have earned $8 million.  That's a hefty salary for someone who likely won't be ready to play until May after having surgery to repair a torn labrum in his right shoulder.  Instead, he gets a $500,000 buyout.  This was an easy call for the Royals.  Someone will take a chance on Crisp, but it will likely be on an incentive-laden contract and on a team that can afford to give some cash to a guy who figures to open the year on the DL.

I'm kind of surprised the Royals didn't offer to pick up Olivo's option for $3.3 million.  It's a mutual option, meaning Olivo could have (and most likely would have) turned it down.  The Royals probably knew for certain that Olivo didn't want to return at those terms, so they decided to dispense with the formality and let him go at a cost of $100,000.  This doesn't necessarily mean the John Buck will be your number one catcher next year.  The Royals still have to decide whether or not to tender him a contract for 2010.  It's not out of the realm of possibility that the Royals and Olivo reach an agreement on a new contract that would pay him more than the $3.3 million he was due for next season.

And Yabuta... Complete bust.  He gets a $500,000 buyout.  Good riddance.


Read 11 Comments... >>
 
Premature Optimistic Analysis on an Unofficial Trade
Written by Clark Fosler   
Friday, 06 November 2009 10:51

Okay, so the Mark Teahen to the White Sox deal is curiously stuck in trade limbo.  Is is simply a case of waiting for Chris Getz to pass a physical?   Is it a matter of the Royals kicking in some cash to make the deal?   Are there prospects involved?

I am taking the stance that all this 'smoke' must be coming from a pretty fair sized 'fire' and as such that this deal will eventually happen.  

Taking that assumption let's have a little fun:

 

Career Minor League Stats

Seasons

Ave

OBP

SLG

OPS

HR

Chris Getz

5

.286

.362

.380

.742

17

Brian Roberts

6

.281

.377

.372

.749

6

 

Age 24 Season in AAA

Games

Ave

OBP

SLG

OPS

Chris Getz

111

.302

.366

.448

.814

Brian Roberts

78

.275

.361

.377

.738

To be fair, Roberts returned for a partial season in AAA at age twenty-five and put up a line of .315/.401/.399/.800.  

Okay, one more table:

 

Age 25 Season in the Majors

Games

Ave

OBP

SLG

OPS

Doubles

Home Runs

Stolen Bases

Chris Getz (2009)

107

.261

.324

.347

.670

18

2

25

Brian Roberts (2003)

112

.270

.337

.367

.704

22

5

23

Roberts had already logged 113 games in the majors in 2001 and 2002, but 2003 was basically his first year of regular duty, so that seems to be pretty comparable to Getz's true rookie season.

Am I saying that Chris Getz is the next Brian Roberts?  No, but it is interesting to note that Roberts came into the majors without a particularly impressive resume, either.

 


Read 2 Comments... >>
 
BREAKING - Royals Trade Mark Teahen
Written by Craig Brown   
Thursday, 05 November 2009 10:51

Make sure you read all the way to the updates... An interesting day, for sure.  Original post follows...

-------------------------------------

According to the NY Daily News:

While the Yankees and Phillies continued to wage their World Series battle Wednesday night, the Chicago White Sox and Kansas City Royals were making a trade.

The Daily News learned the White Sox have agreed to send second baseman Chris Getz and third baseman Josh Fields to the Royals for Mark Teahen, who is expected to replace Jermaine Dye as Chicago's right fielder.


Dayton Moore doesn't wait around.  The man pulled the trigger on last year's Jacobs deal hours after the World Series and it looks again like he's getting a head start on the Hot Stove.

And unlike last year's first trade which was a stinker, this one has some potential.

I'll have some more analysis later - pending confirmation from the Royals - but the most important thing to note is both Getz and Fields are under club control for the next two seasons.  That makes them inexpensive.  Teahen made almost $4 million last year and was sure to get a bump in his final year of eligibility for arbitration.

This certainly raises some questions.  What happens to Alberto Callaspo at second?  Getz isn't that much better defensively and Callaspo has a stronger bat.  Where will Fields play?  He's not a good defender, but will the Royals move him or Alex Gordon to first and then shift Butler to DH?  Or will Fields be the primary designated hitter?

My instant reaction says getting two cost controlled players for one expensive, mediocre talent makes this a win for the Royals.

If the Daily News report is accurate and this deal is done, it's safe to say GMDM is off to a much better start this off season.

UPDATE:  The Chicago Sun-Times says the White Sox have confirmed the deal.

UPDATE #2:  Dayton Moore says, "There's nothing to announce."

UPDATE #3:  Mark Teahen is sleeping in his Royal PJs.

UPDATE #4: The Chicago Tribune says nothing has been confirmed.


Read 10 Comments... >>
 
Royals Team Of The Decade - The Infield
Written by Craig Brown   
Thursday, 05 November 2009 00:00
These things seem sort of cliche, but they can be kind of fun.  Or sad, if you’re a Royals fan.  As the decade comes to a close, there will be all sorts of “Best of” and “Worst of” lists covering the previous ten years.  It’s almost as if we’re contractually obligated to offer a list for the best Royals team of the aughts.

The criteria here is simple:  To be considered, a player had to play over 50% of his games with the Royals at the position where he is listed and he had to accumulate over 500 plate appearances.  The number of plate appearances may not sound like much (it is roughly one full season) but believe me, if we made it any higher, we would severely limit the number of eligible players.  Such was life for the Royals this decade.  Rarely, did players stick around for multiple seasons.

The numbers that follow the player are only the stats he accumulated as a Royal.

The winners should get a plaque or a trophy.  That would be kind of cool.  And if this blog is around in another 10 years, we’ll do it again.

For now, our focus is on the aughts.  Today, we unveil the infield. 

Envelopes, please...

First Base
Mike Sweeney  2000-2007
.304/.375/.507
OPS+ 125


Perhaps the most polarizing Royal of the decade was also the top offensive performer.

Sweeney’s breakout year came in 1999, but his best seasons were from 2000 to 2002.  Simply put, the man was an offensive animal.  Many fans point to his 2000 season where he had a club record 144 RBI, but I don’t need to tell you the RBI is an overrated stat.  That’s not to say his ’00 season wasn’t a good one.  He hit .333//407/.523 with a career high 29 home runs.  He was named to his first All-Star team and he finished 11th in the MVP vote.  The high RBI was the byproduct of hitting in the middle of the order on what was a pretty good offensive club.  With Johnny Damon batting leadoff and Jermaine Dye behind him in the order, Sweeney was surrounded by quality bats.

Really his best season was 2002.  That was the year he hit .340/.417/.563 - all numbers were career high.  However, that was also the first time Sweeney missed time because of his back.  He hit the disabled list in mid-July for the first time in what was to become an annual event.  He played in 126 games in 2002.  He would never play in that many games in a season again.

As the injuries piled up, Sweeney’s production dropped.  He put together a nice season in 2005, playing in 122 games and hitting .300/.347/.517, but his final two years in Kansas City were forgettable.  Combined, he played in just 134 games and hit just .259/.331/.419 with only 15 home runs.

Sweeney took a ton of crap for the injuries, but in my opinion it was undeserved.  Besides, knowing what we learned about the club medical staff this year, maybe it’s not surprising Sweeney couldn’t overcome his health issues.  

It’s too bad, because when healthy, he was one of the top offensive performers in the league. 

Second Base
Mark Grudzielanek  2006-2008
.300/.339/.412
OPS+ 98


Grudz was surprisingly productive with the bat during his three year stint with the Royals.  In his 14 year career, he posted an OPS+ of 100 or greater in only four seasons.  He did it in two of his three years in Kansas City. 

His line of .302/.346/.426 in 2007 was one of the most productive seasons of his career, and coming at age 37, was something of a pleasant surprise.

But Grudz doesn’t make this team solely on the strength of his stick.  His glove was above average at a position where defense is key.  He finished with a positive +/- rating in the Fielding Bible and was in the top 10 among his position in 2006 and 2007.

Alberto Callaspo has better offensive numbers than Grudz, but his glove (or lack of one) keeps him off the team.

Shortstop
Mike Aviles  2008-2009
.293/.322/.429
OPS+ 100


Aviles makes this team basically on the strength of four solid months of baseball.

Think about that for a moment.  Aviles’ four months were enough to catapult him to the head of the class covering an entire decade.  Unreal.  But that’s what happens when your competition is Angel Berroa (78 OPS+), Rey Sanchez (67 OPS+), Neifi Perez (45 OPS+) and Tony Pena (43 OPS+).

A call-up in May of 2008, to ease the suck of Tony Pena, Jr., Aviles had an outstanding rookie campaign, hitting .325/.354/.480 in 441 plate appearances.  Most of us figured he’d come off those numbers quite a bit, but no one saw a year where he would hit .183/.208/.250.  Aviles was initially diagnosed with a forearm strain, but further examination revealed a much more serious issue and he underwent Tommy John surgery in early July. 

Third Base
Joe Randa  2000-2004
.283/.336/.422
OPS+ 93


The Joker was always a fan favorite, but he makes this team on merit.

Actually, the offensive stats between the other two third basemen who qualified for this honor are quite close.  Take a look:

Mark Teahen:  .269/.331/.419
Alex Gordon:  .250/.331/.415

Man, third base was the Royals most consistent offensive position this decade. 

Unfortunately, consistent isn’t synonymous with quality.  The numbers are good, but nothing special.  Especially for a third baseman.

Defensively, Randa was above average with the glove.  Certainly, he was better than either Teahen or Gordon.  In 2004, Randa’s UZR/150 was 21.2 - the highest rate among AL third basemen.  By comparison, Gordon’s career best rate was a 7.9 in his rookie year of 2007 and Teahen has never had a positive number.

Catcher
Miguel Olivo 2008-2009
.251/.286/.470
OPS+ 98


Like third base, there’s not much to choose from at this position. 

That Olivo is the choice here says more about the Royals inability to find anyone of quality to fill this position.  Like shortstop, catcher has been a black hole of production in this franchise for over a decade. 

John Buck has seen more action than any Royal behind the plate this decade, but his numbers of .235/.298/.407 certainly don’t merit his extensive playing time.  Yeah, his OBP is better than Olivo’s, but Buck’s lack of power is enough to push Olivo to the top of the heap.

Olivo gets the nod soley based on his offensive stats.  His defense infuriates me, but Buck isn’t much better.  Fine, Olivo has a good arm.  But the deterrent isn’t enough to outweigh all the freebies Olivo gives on passed balls and wild pitches.  (Sure the wild pitches are supposed to be on the pitcher, but a quality catcher would save some of those.  Olivo is the worst catcher I’ve ever seen at blocking balls in the dirt.  And don’t even get me started about how he sets up to field a throw to the plate.)  The third option, Brett Mayne was fairly abysmal behind the dish as well.  Besides, he was dreadful with the bat. 

The infield is set, so next week we’ll turn our attention to the outfield.
Read 3 Comments... >>
 
The Bullpens of the AL Central
Written by Clark Fosler   
Wednesday, 04 November 2009 10:27

At last, we reach the final positional analysis of our long running series on the Royals versus their American League Central foes:  the bullpen.   Let's not waste any time and jump right into the numbers:

 

Losses

Blown Saves

Innings

WHIP

FIP

ERA

Kansas City

26

22

477

1.55

4.58

5.02

Chicago

22

18

470

1.44

3.92

4.06

Cleveland

24

18

519

1.43

4.68

4.66

Detroit

22

24

491

1.46

4.66

4.34

Minnesota

20

16

518

1.36

4.32

3.87

Some of you may be thinking, 'why losses?  After all, won-loss records are perhaps one of the poorest indicators of a pitcher's performance'.   You are right about that, but when dealing with a bullpen as an entire unit, I think losses is a very telling stat.  I cannot think of a way for the bullpen as a whole to be tagged with a loss without having something to do with it.

As such, that the Royals led the division in this dubious category is no surprise.   That they did not lap the competition (I guess lap in reverse might be the better term)was a surprise. 

Very few of you are probably shocked to see that the bullpen had a division worst earned run average.   As the Royals' FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching) reflects, the relievers were certainly not helped by the Royals' ridiculously poor fielding.   Still, with a markedly higher WHIP than anyone else in the division, this unit was a major weakness on a weak team.  

Trust me, you don't even want to know how these numbers shake out if you take Joakim Soria's 1.132 WHIP and 2.21 ERA out of the equation.

Throughout the 2009 campaign, the Royals' pen was generally mismanaged and, as it turned out, poorl y constructed in the off-season.   General Manager Dayton Moore signed Kyle Farnsworth to a horrible three year contract which will likely make him the highest paid garbage innings reliever in baseball next year.   Manager Trey Hillman went from a strict 'this is your role and that is the only way I will use you' type handler to a 'ride the hot hand' guy to a 'pick names out of a hat' gambler.  

 To his credit, Hillman did use Soria for mulitple inning saves after the All-Star Break with a great deal of success.   That is not a long-term solution for a good team, but for struggling group it gave them a chance to win a couple games a week and stay below 100 losses.   The funny thing about this is that I think Hillman went to Soria for two inning saves at first to prove a point:  hoping that another save situation would come up the next day with Soria unavailable and then everyone would shut up about how he should be using his closer.   What transpired was that the Royals simply were not very good at producing save situations in back to back games and the two-inning save strategy actually worked!

At any rate, once Juan Cruz went from effective to ineffective to injured, the Royals bullpen outside of Soria was a disaster.  I like to play craps in the casinos...a lot..and I don't think I would have had the intestinal fortitude to show up at the ballpark everyday knowing that at some point I was going to have to roll the dice on a reliever not wearing the number forty-eight.

Solution

The Royals are stuck with Kyle Farnsworth (due $4.5 million in 2010) and Juan Cruz (another $3.25 million).   At this point, no one in baseball believes, or should believe, that Farnsworth will ever be effective in a high leverage situation.   The Royals should just reconcile their egos to this fact and use Farnsworth in the blow-outs or when they are down 5-1 in the 8th inning.   He will actually be fine in those situations and likely allow the club to save more effective relievers for another day.

As for Cruz, the organization has to hope that his decline prior to going on the disabled list was actually a result of tyring to pitch through an injury.   The alternative is that Juan has simply 'lost it'.   Probably the correct course of action would be to put him in middle relief to start the season and see what happens.  Maybe they get lucky and Cruz bounces back to become the primary set-up man.  Maybe not, but the Royals will certainly find out:  they don't have any other choice.

As for the rest of the pen, I see no reason to bring back a Jamey Wright or John Bale or Bruce Chen or just about anyone that we saw last year.   It is sink or swim time for twenty-four year old Carlos Rosa, so barring a spring training meltdown, he gets a spot in the pen and the Royals should be fully prepared to give a slew of relievers who were in AA and AAA last year a real shot at making the team for 2010.

Frankly, by June of last year, I thought Northwest Arkansas had a better bullpen than Kansas City did and I was only being a little sarcastic.   Chris Hayes, Chris Nicoll, Dusty Hughes, Greg Holland and others are likely to be as good, if not eventually better, than the six, seven, even eight guys that the Royals tried in front of Joakim Soria last year.   

Next Monda, I will wrap this series up with my thoughts on the Royals' off-season.

 


Read 5 Comments... >>
 
Crow Makes His Debut
Written by Craig Brown   
Tuesday, 03 November 2009 10:40
November has only just begun and already, I’m missing the opportunity to analyze individual performances and how they relate to the big picture.

(Honestly, this post-season - while it’s been moderately interesting - has been long.  Extremely long.  While I’m a purist in a traditional baseball sense, the fact the Phillies and Yankees are playing past Halloween doesn’t really bother me.  I’m just annoyed that the off season has been late in starting.  Give me the hot stove.)

Thankfully, there’s a little baseball being played in Arizona.  And Aaron Crow made his professional debut for the Surprise Rafters last week.  And MLB.com was set for Gameday, which means there’s PITCHf/x data!

Perhaps he was a little excited by the moment - considering it was a year and a half in the making, who could blame him.  Crow came out of the gate firing, and missing.  He threw five fastballs to the first batter he faced and was down in the count 3-0 before walking him.  Not a great start, but we can see from the location that he was likely a little amped up which was why he was high in the zone.

Crow_Batter1

His fastballs were 92 mph, except for the strike, which was 94 mph.

Crow threw two more fastballs and retired the next hitter on a popup to second.  He started his third batter with another fastball before unveiling his slider.  He unleashed a pair - one for a called strike and one that was fouled off - before finishing with another fastball. 

In the second inning, Crow’s velocity dropped.  The fastball which was setting at 92 or 93 mph in the first was now down to 90 mph.  However, the Saguros were swinging and Crow needed just three pitches to record the first two outs.  To  the third batter in the inning, Crow featured four consecutive fastballs before finishing him off with a slider for his first strikeout. 

Crow_Batter2

This is a nice sequence of pitches that illustrates how he was able to avoid the center of the plate.  Plus, from here it looks as though the pitches that were called balls were borderline.  He’s belt high, which isn’t ideal, but if he can stay on the corners, he’ll do just fine.

The third inning was a bit rocky for Crow in that the Seguros decided to make him work. They began taking pitches and fouled off a couple as well.  Crow was again sitting at 90/91 mph with his fastball and was relying on his change and his slider as his out pitch.  It was effective except in the case of Lance Zawadzki.  Zawadzki, Peoria’s leadoff man, turned on the first pitch he saw - a 92 mph fastball - and hit it out of the park.  According to PITCHf/x, it was a belt high pitch on the inner half of the plate.  A mistake pitch.

In his fourth inning of work, Crow was still doing well mixing his pitches and maintaining his velocity, but allowed a single and a two out triple and was touched for another run.  The triple was probably a bit discouraging as he was ahead in the count 1-2 and left a slider up in the zone to a right handed hitter. 

His final line:
4 IP, 3 H, 2 R, 1 BB, 2 SO

Here’s his pitch breakdown:

59 pitches
38 strikes
4 swinging strikes

He recorded six ground outs, four fly outs and two strikeouts.

Overall, not a bad debut by the Royals top draft choice of 2009.  He was elevating too many of his pitches, but was catching enough of the corner that the damage was somewhat limited.  The triple and the home run were both on pitches that were up in the zone and caught too much of the plate.  Considering how long it had been since he had pitched in a (somewhat) competitive game, a little rust was certainly understandable. 

Hopefully, he’ll continue to get his work in and will be ready to show the Royals something when they open camp next February.
Read 2 Comments... >>
 
Did Brad Lidge Just Shape the Royals' Off-Season Plans?
Written by Clark Fosler   
Monday, 02 November 2009 10:11

Brad Lidge imploded in the ninth inning of Game Four of the World Series last night and harkened back to a series previously written on this website.  About one month ago, I speculated on a possible trade of Joakim Soria to the Phillies.   Did Lidge's continuing problems just make this idea, rampant speculation that it is, more relevant?

On Wednesday, I will finish off our review of the American League Central:  focusing on, you guessed it, the bullpens.   For now, I pose this question:

If the Royals actually do put Joakim Soria on the market, is he the most desirable closer out there?   If so, would you as the Royals' general manager (not as a fan, mind you) pull the trigger on the deal I proposed or a different one or not at all?


Read 10 Comments... >>
 
Comparing the Starters in the Central
Written by Clark Fosler   
Wednesday, 28 October 2009 09:04

Over the past couple of weeks, we have compared the positions in the field of the five American League Central teams.   We learned that as frustrating as the Royals' catchers are, they hold up pretty well in comparison (offensively at least) to their divisional brethren.   While we probably knew that Billy Butler, Alberto Callaspo and David DeJesus were okay, our research affirmed that they more than hold their own at their respective positions.  We also knew and had reaffirmed that Mike Jacobs and Yuniesky Betancourt are awful and that center and right field seem to be an abyss of an undetermined, yet horrific, depth.

Today, we move on to the starting rotations.   We will use some standard metrics (innings pitched and earned run average) along with the nearly standard WHIP and BABIP (batting average of balls in play), plus we will also use Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP).   Most of you probably are aware of FIP and that it is used to try to analyze what the pitcher can control and take either a good defense or a horrible defense out of the equation.   Let's have a look:

 

 

ERA

FIP

WHIP

BABIP

Innings

Kansas City

4.73

4.25

1.42

.313

949

Chicago

4.20

4.35

1.31

.289

970

Cleveland

5.30

4.75

1.56

.320

915

Detroit

4.34

4.45

1.39

.302

956

Minnesota

4.84

4.42

1.40

.316

934

How much is BABIP effected by a team's defense?   I ask that only because the White Sox starters allowed a pretty low BABIP, which helped them to a division leading WHIP and earned run average.

What we see from the Royals (if you are willing to put stock in FIP) is that their starters were considerably better than their earned run average reflected.   Of course, it helps that you have Zack Greinke in the equation and if you took his numbers out of the Royals' totals the rest of the rotation would become very Cleveland-esque, but we don't have to do that.  Zack Greinke will be in the rotation next year and give Kansas City the luxury of trotting out the best pitcher in baseball every fifth day.

Solution

Imagine how the Royals' rotation would have compared if Gil Meche had repeated his performances from 2007 and 2008?   The key 'solution' in the off-season is to make sure Meche is healthy come day one of spring training.   Ditto for Brian Bannister.

Assuming Meche is not completely wrecked, he gives the Royals a legitimate number two starter behind Greinke.   Then you add Brian Bannister to the equation (again, assuming he is healthy), whose 2009 season is probably a better representation of who he is than either 2007 or 2008 was.   While Bannister is not a true number three - he likely is a solid number four and that is probably enough to keep the Royals from making some mad reach for an additional starter via trade or free agency.

I make that statement based more on the greater needs of the Royals in other areas as opposed to some faith that either Kyle Davies or Luke Hochevar finally....FINALLY, develop into a consistent middle of the rotation guy.  

Given the tremendous holes both, offensively and defensively, in the everyday lineup, Kansas City almost has to take a gamble that they can find two serviceable or, at least, not horrible starters from the group of Hochevar, Davies, Robinson Tejeda and Anthony Lerew (I kind of liked him in the limited amount of work he got at the end of the year).    If the Royals can soldier through 2010 with two those four - again, assuming both Meche and Bannister are healthy by spring - then they can look to a hopefully emerging Aaron Crow in late 2010 or the beginning of 2011.

In addition, by spring of 2011 at least one of the many promising arms in A ball might be ready to push for a spot in the rotation. I'm not asking for all of those youngsters to develop, just ONE to be close to ready the season after next (Montgomery probably?).

Whatever cash the Royals might have available (likely not much) and whatever trade chips (pathetic as they might be) exist, they would be wise to use those on the everyday lineup and hope a dose of good health and in-house talent fleshes out the starting rotation in 2010.

 

 


Read 11 Comments... >>
 
It Was 24 Years Ago...
Written by Craig Brown   
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 10:57

To Motley, for THE TITLE...

http://blog.timesunion.com/jericsmith/files/2007/04/royals.jpg

http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/88796336.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF19311EB03566168C70E2A71BEAC821157BD26FD13ED7B73D4BC

http://i.cdn.turner.com/sivault/multimedia/photo_gallery/0810/history.october22/images/006273613.jpg

Thanks to Kent for reminding me.  After this many years, the memory becomes fuzzy.

I still have my tickets for Game 6 and Game 7...

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/33/56576428_9208f45711_o.jpg

Here's to the Royals of '85.

 


Read 1 Comments... >>
 
Random Notes - New Trainer Edition
Written by Craig Brown   
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 00:00

I’ve been away… did you miss me?  I missed you.

Unfortunately, October has been a great time for Royals fans to escape for the last 24 or so years.  I can cut myself off from baseball for a week or so and the only thing I’ll miss is a Steve Phillips Slumpbuster or a Mariano Rivera spitball.  Unless either of those things matter to you, it’s just about the best time of the year to take a vacation.

Anyway, here are a couple of Royal tidbits from the last week or so with a little commentary thrown in.

ITEM:  The Royals name Nick Kenney as their new head trainer.

Kenney was an assistant trainer with the Cincinnati Reds from 2003 to 2004 and has been with the Indians in the same capacity since 2005.  The Cleveland training staff was named the best in baseball by Baseball Prospectus and the Professional Baseball Athletic Trainers Association in 2007.

A positive from this:  The Royals wisely went outside the organization to fill this position.  When you have a training staff that couldn’t remove a band-aid, you need to think about going in a different direction. 

And Cleveland does seem to be doing mostly the correct things when it comes to injury.  I mean, somehow Kerry Wood avoided the DL last year.  Hopefully, Kenney had something to do with that.

ITEM:  Zack Greinke was named the Sporting News AL Pitcher of the Year.

It’s not the big award, but still…

This award was voted on by GMs and assistant GMs around the game.  While awards such as this don’t carry the same kind of publicity as some of the other hardware that will be handed out next month, it has to be extremely gratifying that the guys who are supposed to be the game’s top talent evaulators recognize Greinke’s outstanding year. 

My colleagues at Baseball Daily Digest did a vote in a format similar to the one used for the Cy Young and Greinke finished first with 14 out of 15 first place votes.  Somehow, he was third on one ballot.  CC Sabathia was the only other pitcher to earn a first place vote.  That’s embarrassing. 

The Cy Young will be announced on November 17th.

ITEM:  Hal McRae was let go as the hitting coach for the St. Louis Cardinals and was replaced by Mark McGwire.

As far as McRae goes, I’m sure this is of interest to a number of fans, but there’s nothing to see here.  Kevin Seitzer is your hitting coach for 2010 and Trey Hillman is your manager.  You are certainly free to dream, but I’m just trying to caution you to not get too worked up over this. 

No, Seitzer didn’t have a great first year as the Royals hitting coach, but again, he’s not dealing with major league caliber hitters.  Sure, there are some, but there are too many guys who have no business being in the big leagues on this club.  I’m not sure anyone can deal with this crew.  For now, I’ll buy into Dayton Moore’s mantra that patience is necessary.  For now.

And if you want (or are hoping) McRae would return to KC to manage… Please.  I have no clue if he’s still bitter about his time here and the way it ended, but he doesn’t strike me as someone who let’s things like this go away easily.  Even though there is a total new regime in place, I don’t think he’ll ever return.  Besides, I think I saw somewhere that he’s not interested in managing again. 

Actually, I’m more interested in the sideshow that’s going to happen in the big top in St. Louis now that Mark McGwire is back with the team.  I can’t wait for that first confrontation in spring training when McGwire is asked about steroids, because you just know he’ll say something about not talking about the past.  This will be high comedy that has potential to devolve into a large distraction for the Cardinals.  I’m fine with that.

ITEM:  AFL Update

A few minor leaguers of note are toiling in Arizona.  Jerrod Dyson is hitting .333/.333/.467 in 15 at bats.  Jeff Bianchi is .313/.378/.438 in 32 at bats.  And Mike Moustakas is .276/.313/.483 in 29 at bats.  Moustakas is tied for second on the team with 9 RBI. 

Blake Wood has thrown five innings in two starts and has a 3.60 ERA.  All players are on the Surprise Rafters.

Following the Facebook Fiasco, I wonder how strange things are for the Royals minor league department when they watch Danny Gutierrez pitch for the Rafters.  He hasn’t allowed a run in 6.2 innings spanning a pair of starts. 

I don't know about you guys, but I can't wait until the World Series is over and the first bone headed move by our General Manager to announce the off season.

 


Read 2 Comments... >>
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 8 of 14

Search

Latest Forum Posts

Rule 5 Update
by cfos 2009/12/10 08:06
Brad Thompson...
by cfos 2009/11/19 11:11
Re:Meche Likely Done For The Year
by cfos 2009/09/10 12:56
Re:Meche Likely Done For The Year
by cbrown 2009/09/10 11:50
Meche Likely Done For The Year
by Craig Brown 2009/09/10 11:35

Final AL Central

TEAM W L GB
Minnesota 87 76 --
Detroit 86 77 5.5
Chicago
79 83 7.5
Cleveland
65 97 21.5
Kansas City
65 97 21.5
There's always next year.

Syndication

feed-image RSS Feed
Get more sports from Dish Network Kansas City

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Bloggers Wanted

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. We're specifically looking for blogs in the sports, entertainment, and video games field, but are open to adding any type of quality site.. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!