PECOTA On The Juice
Written by Craig Brown   
Friday, 29 January 2010 00:14

Thursday was PECOTA day in the internet baseball universe as it was the day Baseball Prospectus unveiled their annual projections.  Perhaps most famous for calling Tampa’s jump from worst to first in 2008, the PECOTAs have long been the standard by which other projections have been measured.

I’m beginning to wonder what all the fuss is about.

This isn’t about the Royals won-loss projection or about their position in the AL Central.  Let’s take care of this right away.  Here’s how PECOTA says the Central will play out.

Pecota_Standings

At this stage in the winter, I can’t quibble with the standings.  The Twins added a couple decent bats and it seems like none of the five has done a damn thing to improve their rotations.  So it figures the standings would remain bunched together for yet another season.  They should call it the AL Status Quo.

However, I don’t think that 82 wins will take the division.  Last year, the Twins won the division with 87 wins and I expect the same number will be required, give or take a couple of wins.  It also seems like either the White Sox or the Tigers could leapfrog the Twins and take control of the division.  At this point, it wouldn’t be a surprise if any of the top three teams took the crown.  The Indians win total seems wildly optimistic. 

The Royals projection seems correct.

So my issue with PECOTA this year isn’t with the standings, although the won-loss records could use some adjusting.  My issue is with the expected offense.

PECOTA is on the juice.  Check how their projection for runs scored fits into the 10 year run scoring trend.  The following graph represents the total runs scored in the AL for each year since 2000.  The 2010 number on the right is the PECOTA projection.

Pecota_Runs

Wow.  It’s projecting 11,656 runs will be scored in the American League.  If that happened, it would be the second most since 2000, when 11,995 runs crossed the plate.  After some… uh, inflated numbers in the late nineties, the trend seems to be fewer runs.  This projection calls for a substantial increase of over 700 runs.  While that’s a huge number, it’s not unprecedented.  A similar jump occurred from ’95 to ’96. (Don’t worry, I adjusted for the shortened ’95 season.)

Last year, the league average for runs scored was 781.  PECOTA says every team but the Toronto Blue Jays will outscore the 2009 AL average. 

It’s the same story with OBP.  Last year, the average AL team posted a .336 on base percentage.  PECOTA says every team will top that except the poor Jays. 

For the Royals they rank the top hitters as follows:

Butler - .297/.370/.489
DeJesus - .294/.379/.433
Callaspo - .298/.363/.422
Gordon - .263/.352/.433
Ankiel - .257/.323/.470

In short, they don’t buy Callaspo’s power surge from last year, they expect DeJesus to get on base at a much better clip than ever before (his career high OBP is .366) and they’re looking for Gordon to basically repeat his 2008 season.

Overall, they have the Royals down for a .346 OBP and a .424 slugging percentage.  Those are both big increases from 2009 when they posted a .318 OBP and a .405 slugging percentage.  Objectively, I ask you to look at this lineup compared to last year’s and tell me if you think they’ve improved that much.  I’ll go ahead and call my shot right now and say they’ll be within five points of both stats.  They’re not going to improve their OBP by 28 points.  Not with Yuniesky Betancourt and Jason Kendall anchoring the bottom of the order. That’s insane.

How about the pitching?  Would you be interested to know they project a 4.82 ERA and 1.51 WHIP for Gil Meche?  Or more alarmingly, a 4.01 ERA and 1.35 WHIP for Zack Greinke? 

Are you kidding? 

If Greinke has an ERA over 3.50, I’ll be so depressed I won’t be able to get out of bed.  That’s a helluva regression.

But hang on.  Do you know what PECOTA projected for Greinke in 2009?  A 4.01 ERA and a 1.30 WHIP!  Whew!

OK.  This isn’t meant to bash PECOTA.  All projections have their hits and misses.  This is mostly for fun and fantasy baseball players anyway.  The BP crew does a nice job getting this info out and standing behind what they do.  I can respect that, even if I don’t put much stock in it.  The offensive numbers they are projecting for 2010 just seem way too high to be realistic.  Again, I'm only looking at the league as a whole and the Royals as individuals.  There just seem to be some elevated OBP numbers for nearly everyone on the Royals.

Personally, I’ve moved on to CHONE for my projections.  Of all the projections I revisit, they seem to be closest to the mark with the greatest frequency.  For 2010, they have Greinke at a 3.33 ERA and a 1.19 WHIP.  Yeah, I like that one better.



Digg! Reddit! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! BallHype: hype it up!

Comments

avatar Ron
0
 
 
I'll start the over/under at 59.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Karte
0
 
 
I'll take the over. Their pitching should be equal or better than last year. Their defense should be much better. Their offense will be worse. It's hard work losing 100 games, and I don't think this team has it in them.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Leon
0
 
 
So...the Royals have gotten better in a number of spots and have much better depth (and the law of averages says we should be healthier next year...)

And the division has gotten worse. Really everyone but maybe Minnesota...

But we're going to win ONE more game that we did this year?

Whatever.

Ron, I'd put the over/under at 74, and take the over in a heartbeat.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Charles in KC
0
 
 
74? Leon, are you paying attention?

Expected regression to more normal performances: (1) Greinke, (2) Callaspo. Take 3 wins off for those two. That's being conservative. Subtract 1 win at catcher. Add 2 with regression from Gordon. Betancourt is an expected add 1 (he's horrible, but I don't think he is as bad as the average SS the Royals played last year) add 1 for the bench (it should be better) add 1 for the bullpen (it should be better). I might say also add 1 in the outfield, but I'm not 100% sure.... And add 1 at DH (we can't be as bad as we were there, can we?)... Even with all that (and there are some pretty optimistic assessments in there) I only get to 69.

So where are the rest of the 4 more you get Leon? Do you not knock some off for Greinke and Callaspo? How about if we don't even play Callaspo as seems likely? The loss of offense from Callspo 2009 to Getz is probably worth 3 wins alone. Do you add a win or two for Meche? Maybe?

How do you get to 74?
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Monster
0
 
 
I think you pick up a few wins with a season's worth of a healthy Soria.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Clark Fosler
0
 
 
I'll take the under with Leon, but the over with Ron. 69 or 70 wins is sticking in my head (at least untill the euphoria of spring training and warm weather gets me all warm and fuzzy and carried away). Like Craig, I don't expect a huge regression from Greinke and the law of averages says the Royals almost have to give him more run support (not because of a better offense, just because it's hard to score so little for a guy year after year). Call his games even, more wins from a healthy Meche and you hope the bullpen is better by a win or two. I think that gets you to 69 or 70.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Ted
0
 
 
Maybe he isn't considered an addition, but Chicago will have a full season of Jake Peavy this year. That is an improvement.

Also, Liriano is pitching well in the Dominican, so that is probably an improvement for MN. Plus Neshek is returning from injury and they added three or four new relievers either at the trade deadline last summer or during this offseason, which means their bullpen will look quite different.

And the Tigers lost Edwin Jackson but gained Max Sherzer. That could go either way: win, lose or draw.

Anyway, there was movement in the pitching staffs this winter, and they were definitely meaningful.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar gbewing
0
 
 
I disagree on the assertion that noone improved their rotation. For me the White Sox are a clear favorite because of their rotation. They added Peavy late but a front 4 of Peavy Buehrle, Floyd and Danks is rock solid- all #2 and up potential Peavy I expect more homers in Chicago but he clearly has ace potential - Danks and Floyd have shown young promise and Buehrle is stable as stable can be. Freddy Garcia is a fine enough #5 Daniel Hudson in the wings. I don't like a lot of their offensive moves this winter but they still have a decent lineup with upside Pierre-Rios and Quinten - (2 need to play well ) Jordan Danks may emerge.Beckham is a rising force at 2b(sleeper MVP candidate) Konerko solid at 1b Alexi Ramirez will be fine at SS Tyler Flowers may break out - but the stable steady pitching day in day out I think makes them class of division. Indians have no rotation, Tigers seemed to recognize they are aging and fading and stepped back for 2010 to be stronger 2011 -They have a looming great rotation but may need another year to fully take advantage (Verlander-Porce llo-Scherzer certainly looks good to me ) offensively I only see Cabrera being strong. One of the kids might have a year Sizemore or Jackson but not enough Inge will drop off and Everett doesnt hit, Avila needs to take over Lairds job -

Twins are the Twins - they'll be there and if no one takes it they will slip in.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar GordonB
0
 
 
Looks like those projections have been revised...there must have been an error.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Craig Brown
0
 
 
They revised them, but they're still fishy. No NL team will win more than 86 games and only one will win less than 74? And the Royals slash line barely moved. It's now at .279/.346/.423. The only thing that changed was a one point drop in slugging. Greinke's line (and Meche's) improved, but not enough. I know they still have to fiddle with their projected playing time, but still... They probably should have fine tuned them before releasing them.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar gbewing
0
 
 
Minor League Baseball Analyst is out and interesting Royal notes
Royals are ranked 6th overall in organizational rankings
Hitting Prospects = B-
Pitching Prospectgs = A- ( tied for 2nd overall)
Top level talent (elite prospects) = A-tied for 3rd overall
Depth = B
Overall = B+

they don't project any break through players coming up 2010
Manual Pina is rated 2nd best defensive catching prospect in minor league- ready defensively for majors right now (no plate patience - of course)

Will Myers - 8th ranked catching prospect
Moustakas - 8th ranked 3b prospect

I find one of those encouraging and 1 discouraging looking at stages of development
Highest ranked of top 100 overall prospects Mike Montgomery 13th
Royals top 15
1. Mike Montgomery
2.aaron Crow
3. Mike Moustakos
4. Danny Duffy
5. Eric Hosmer
6. Will Myers
7. Tim melville
8. John Lamb
9. Carlos Rosa
10. Jordan Parraz
11. Chris Dwyer
12. David Lough
13. Tyler Sample
14. Johnny Giovatolla
15. Jason Taylor

(don't forget list made before signing Argoles who I estimate at landing 4th on this list

other notables, Daniel Cortes is ranked 11th best prospect for Sea
Danny Gutierez is ranked as Texas 6th best prospect
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
 
Get more sports from Dish Network Kansas City

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Bloggers Wanted

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. We're specifically looking for blogs in the sports, entertainment, and video games field, but are open to adding any type of quality site.. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!