Failing At The Outfield Puzzle
Written by Craig Brown   
Tuesday, 26 January 2010 00:32

You are looking at a puzzle.  It’s a simple puzzle, really.  Three pieces.  That’s it.  Your job is to assemble these three pieces in a way that makes the most sense.

This is the task facing Dayton Moore as he tries to piece together his outfield for the upcoming season.  Things like this happen when you have Mitch Maier on your roster and go ahead and sign Brian Anderson, who is http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3529/3770636413_848e3d2c9c_m.jpgbasically the same player as Maier.  And then you sign Scott Podsednik, who is only marginally better than Anderson.  Then you sign Rick Ankiel, who is better offensively than all the aforementioned, but now throws the outfield situation into a jumble.  Add David DeJesus and you have five outfielders for three positions.  Wondering where everyone is going to play?  You’re not alone.

Apparently, Moore has it all figured out.  His outfield will have Podsednik in left, Ankiel in center and DeJesus in right.

"We feel that right now, going into spring training, this is the best way to position our outfield defense," Moore said. "These three guys are all capable of playing center field. We felt Rick's best use is to put him in center field at this time."

So the Royals wanted Ankiel so bad, they promised him center field?  Did they even bother to see if that’s, you know… His best position?  Because it’s not.

This outfield mumbo jumbo reminds me of the Jose Guillen signing from 2008.  Remember, Guillen had been a right fielder for most of his career, but the Royals decided he would play left.  Only, they forgot to tell Guillen this fact.  I guess they learned from that mistake and went ahead and handed center to Ankiel during negotiations.  And according to Ankiel, the Yankees were finalists for his signature.  The Yankees!  Do you want to compete with Brett Gardner and Nick Swisher for a role in the outfield and what seems to be a virtual lock on a spot in the postseason, or do you want to be handed the center field job on a fifth place team for one year that’s treading water until the prospects (hopefully) develop?  Honestly, I question Ankiel’s sanity. 

Later in the press conference, Moore claimed the Royals have the best defensive outfield in the AL Central.  Of course they are going to say crap like that.  What do you think they’re going to say?  “Uh, we’re just kind of throwing things randomly out there.  We’ll see what happens.  Fingers crossed, it will work out.” 

Apparently, the Royals are excited because they have what amounts to three center fielders in their outfield.  That’s great, except for this simple fact:  They aren’t very good center fielders to begin with.  None of these guys will be mistaken for Franklin Gutierrez or BJ Upton. They won’t even be confused with Aaron Rowand or Shane Victorino.  These are ordinary, average to below average defensive outfielders. 

(Certainly, any time you can remove Jose Guillen from the outfield mix, you have addition through subtraction.  Throw three chairs out there and your defense is better.  But, still...) 

Only the Royals, coming off a year where the team was horrible defensively and in a winter where there stated goal was to improve their defense, would move their best defensive player from the previous season.  Are you kidding?  Sometimes, you wonder if the guys running this team even watch the games. 

Let’s play a game.  Let’s try to fill the Royals outfield with their preferred starting three. We’ll look at career UZR/150 at all positions across the outfield.  Take the ratings for right field with a grain of salt.  That’s because in their careers, DeJesus has played 166 innings in right, while Ankiel has played 383 innings and Podsednik has played just 124 innings.  The Rng is career range in the outfield.  The ARM is the outfield arm rating for their career.  Both Rng and ARM are presented as collected by FanGraphs.  I adjusted the ARM rating (since it’s a counting stat) by 1,000 innings played.

OF_Defense

These are the pieces of our puzzle.  Let’s start assembling this sucker.

Since centerfield is the most important of the three outfield positions and there’s only one of the three players who has a positive UZR/150 in center, I’ll go with Player B.  Although right field is more important defensively on the defensive spectrum, I’ll place the left fielder next, if only because again, none of the three has spent much time at all in right.  Since it looks like my best left fielder is also my best center fielder, I have to go with my second choice.  Looks like it’s going to be Player A.  Hang on though.  Player A has the least range and has the best arm of the bunch.  That seems like he’s taylor made for right field.  And since Player C has some decent range and the weakest arm of my group, it seems like it’s natural to put him in left while positioning Player A in right.

Time to unveil my starting outfield.

Player C is Scott Podsednik, who I would play in left field.

Player B is David DeJesus, who I would play in center.

Player A is Rick Ankiel, who can have right.

See how simple that is? 

This confirms my gut assessment of watching all these guys play over the last couple of years.  Ankiel lacks the range to play center, but has an arm that can make a difference in right.  Podsednik has a weak arm and occasionally takes some bizarre routes on fly balls which makes left his best fit.  And while DeJesus has lost a step in the last year or so and doesn’t have the greatest range, he’s still the best of this group, so that makes him the center fielder. 

And let’s take a moment for a defensive spectrum refresher.  From left to right, the most important defensive position to the least important:

C-SS-2B-CF-3B-RF-LF-1B

So according to this, center field is the most important defensive position in the outfield.  And according to my numbers, Rick Ankiel is the least qualified of the three starters to player center.  Therefore, since this is the Royals, Rick Ankiel will be the starting center fielder.  Are you kidding me?

Look, anytime you can construct an outfield that doesn’t include Jose Guillen or Willie Bloomquist, that’s a win.  And as I mentioned before, when you remove Guillen’s glove you’re automatically improving the defense.  I haven't mentioned Maier, because it's clear he isn't in the plans for the future.  Although he could probably provide the same production as Podsednik, Moore has chosen to spend a couple million when he could have had the same thing for under $500k.

Regardless, this has a chance of being a decent defensive outfield.  Not great.  Good.  And certainly better than last year. 

Except Moore is doing his best to screw everything up.

Moore has failed Roster Construction 101 time and again.  Now, his oddball collection of middle infielders has been replaced by a strange group of outfield misfits.  Initially, I was on board with the Ankiel signing because I thought he could be an asset.  Now, it seems he’ll serve to make the Royals weaker defensively up the middle.  I have officially given up on having faith in Moore building a roster at the major league level.  In his four winters here, he’s shown exactly zero aptitude in putting together a group of 25 players that have defined roles that make any kind of sense.

The Ankiel signing (and positioning) is the latest in a long list of evidence.


Digg! Reddit! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! BallHype: hype it up!

Comments

avatar Toby V
0
 
 
So Royals want to preach that we want to bring players in here to compete during spring training and win jobs. Then we turn around and already state what our starting OF will be prior to seeing any of these guys play in the spring. I'm sorry, but isn't that what you do once you have core players in place that have proven year after year that they have earned a position? I'm willing to be that come the end of May this OF will be jumbled around again. Can GMDM just target a need and go after a player to fill that need, rather than sign 6 of the same player and wonder why the team isn't getting any better. It's like the whole Guillen failure has changed his approach to building a team.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Ron
0
 
 
One of the reasons they want Ankiel to play CF is because of his inexperience. Playing RF and LF requires a lot of time to track the ball coming at different angles. In CF, the ball comes at less of an angle, thereby making it easier to track. That's another reason CF'ers usually get to more balls. Yeah, they usually run well, but they can track fly balls easier than in the corner.

Also, balls off the wall tend to take a truer bounce and come back at predicitable angles, whereas in the corner, they can hit a corner, take a bad bounce, or hug the wall and roll.

Ankiel is an inexperience OF'er who can play CF. DeJesus is an experienced OF'er who can play RF. I would do the same thing myself.

That's from my personal experience of playing, coaching and watching baseball for 40 years. I don't direct observation doesn't count anymore. You have to be able to attach some mathmatical formula to anything in baseball for it to be true.

Of course, as many people here have told me, I'm an idiot, so i probably don't know what I'm talking about.

Even though I said the Royals would win 71 games last year, and many of you picked them for 80+ wins and to compete in the division.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Toby V
0
 
 
I think I would leave my gold glove caliber Left Fielder in Left field. And If I was in need of a Right fielder, I would go sign one.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Ron
0
 
 
Playing RF and LF requires a lot of time to track the ball coming at different angles.


A lot of time to learn how to track the ball coming at different angles.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Leon
0
 
 
Oh, no. We're going to be better defensively at all three outfield positions. The horror, the horror.

Next you're going to tell me we added 30 steals and upgraded the DH spot, too.

Then you'll say we're going to have the deepest 25 outfield and infield in years.

Clearly, Moore has to go.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Clark Fosler
0
 
 
Leon - It appears to me that the Royals upgraded defensively in right field (as Craig pointed out, how could we not?) with Ankiel, but probably neither Podsednik nor DeJesus is as good in center as Maier (not that he was great, but competent) and Pods will be much worse than DeJesus in left. So, is that really a better overall defensive outfield? I'd play DeJesus in left, where he is above average, Ankiel in right, where his arm is a plus, and live with Pods in center on the idea that being better in two spots is better than just improving one.

However, Ron makes a good point - anyone who has watched Mark Teahen wander around left and right the last three years can't really argue with Ron's ideas on tracking the ball - and maybe Ankiel simply will be so much below average getting to balls in right that his arm seldom comes into play. After all, Jose Guillen has a good arm, too, and I don't remember that helping us much last year.

Now, let's remember that having a hard time picking your 25 guys does not necessarily mean that you are deep - it sometimes means you just have too many guys that are the same. If Getz emerges as an everyday second baseman and Ankiel hits like 2008 and not like Mike Jacobs, then Moore is going to come out of this off-season okay. The addition of Pods and Kendall, however, still remain curious acquisitions for a team that realistically will not contend in 2010.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Craig Brown
0
 
 
Yep, Ron hit on something I meant to discuss... What kind of issues will DeJesus have in shifting from left to right, where everything is essentially backward? He's a good enough athlete and has always been an outfielder, so I don't anticipate too many troubles, but still... Why mess with your best defender and leave yourself open to something that may not be as successful?

Leon - Is the Royals outfield better defensively than 2009? Absolutely. Could they be even better with the proper alignment? Absolutely. Is a Podsednik-Ankie l-DeJesus outfield the best defensive combination? Not even close.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar dls
0
 
 
The bottom line is that DM promised Ankiel that he would play CF (like he wants to) if he signed with the Royals. Everybody else has to slide over to appease Ankiel's greed and arrogance.


B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar KC at the bat
0
 
 
Wait until the R's sign Jim Edmonds, then try to figure out this mess.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar BrettFan1
0
 
 
Recall that Mike Jacobs was supposed to be our 1B last year and that lasted about a week. I would imagine that Moore looks at it like this, if Ankiel looks good in center so be it, if he fails then we'll just tell him that for the good of the team he needs to shift to RF. I'm not quite sure why they thought it was so important to get Ankiel here for one year, but I'm guessing it has to do with the potential of flipping him at the trade deadline. Realistically, there is no chance of the mutual option year coming into play. Then again, maybe Moore was so disgusted with our offense and lack of depth that he was willing to give up a marginal advantage (DeJesus is only marginally better than either Pods or Ankiel in CF) to add some pop to the lineup.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Toby V
0
 
 
When you have a top player at a position, you move him to a new position when a better player comes along and pushes him out of that position. If the Royals would have signed a LF that was better then DeJesus, I would be all for moving him to another position. This reminds me alot of the talks that many have had on here about making Soria a starter. Are you better off as a team taking an All Star closer and making him an avg starter or keeping your all star closer and addressing your poor starting rotation by other means? This team needs ot get to the point that young or new players are forcing guys out of starting rolls by their play on the field. Not just shuffling guys to fill holes.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Ron
0
 
 
65 win teams don't need a guy who can save 45 games. 85 win teams do. If you are a 65 win team and you underachieve by 10 wins, the manager gets fired. If you are a 65 win team and you overachieve by 10 wins, you're still under .500. If you're an 85 win team and you underachieve by 10 wins, that's too bad. If you're an 85 win team and overachieve by 10 wins, you make the playoffs in most years.

A 45 save closer just makes a bad team slightly better, but doesn't do anything to improve the team. 65 win teams don't get to be better by having one guy get the last 3 outs of a game they have the lead in. They get better by having players who can make sure they have the lead going 9th inning enough times to be competitive. The Royals have the first, they don't have the second.

Soria needs to start or be traded for a player who will a legimate impact.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Monster
0
 
 
Yeah...what the heck do we want with a guy who can consistently shut down hitters in the eighth and ninth innings and preserve 45 wins per season while being compared to Mariano Rivero? I mean, Greinke was only good for 16 wins this year. Shoot, there are 160 games in a season and Greinke is only winning 10% of them. A starter who has the potential to win 20 games only makes a bad team slightly better, but doesn't do anything to improve the team on a daily basis. For that matter, with a good hitter like Butler in the lineup, KC only won 65 games. His presence only made a bad team slightly better. We need to package these three players and trade them for a player who has a "true" legitimate impact.

(Sarcasm Intended)
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Ron
0
 
 
Why don't read what i wrote and comment on that. Because that's not what you did. If you want to be sarcastic, that's fine. Just try to understand what it is you're being sarcastic about, because you missed.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Monster
0
 
 
Don't think I missed. You want to trade Soria for a starter cuz he ain't benefiting KC significantly as a closer since we have few leads headed into the ninth. You're saying that KC should trade their strengths to fill their holes. Maybe you're right. I just disagree...no sarcasm intended. I'd even consider agreeing with you if there was an heir apparent to replace Joakim. But, there ain't.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Toby V
0
 
 
I didn't say I had a problem with trading Soria. I'm all for that if the trade is going to return equal talent. I do have a problem moving him to a starter role where he would only be avg. Same with DeJesus - I have not problem trading him. Do have an issue with moving him to another position where he will not be as good. I think a good GM and Manager should play a player where he can be most productive.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Ron
0
 
 
Fair enough. But until the Royals get to the point where they are winning 85 games, they don't need an elite closer. When they get to that point, there will be one available. Look how long it took Valverde to get a job, considering the amount of closers available this year. Closers are the easiest thing to find, because putting up a lot of 3 out innings with a 3 run lead isn't really that hard.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Monster
0
 
 
I get it...but Soria is locked up for a few years and will likely be here when the next wave of prospects hits the show. We want him on that wall. We need him on that wall. :-)
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Ron
0
 
 
I would love to have Soria around when that happens. The problem is, relievers generally don't age well or maintain a sustained level of excellence for too many years. I afraid by the time the Royals are competitive, Soria won't be effective any longer, and they would have missed the chance to trade him/use him as a starter.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Toby V
0
 
 
My point was that you don't move a player from a position that he is above avg or one of the best in the league to a position that he will only be avg, just to fill a hole. Leaving your team now agv or below avg at two positons rather than one. I'm not against trading Soria for equal talent at another positon. But I am against taking an all-star closer and making him an avg starter or taking a gold glove caliber OF and moving him to a position that he will be avg and replacing him with someone not as good. I don't have a problem trading guys. Just a problem moving them to positions that they will be worse, when you are not replacing their position with someone better.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar blahblah
0
 
 
you forgot to mention that Hillman, if allowed to manage all year, will trot out 140 different lineups, so everyone will get a chance to LF/RF/CF/3B/1B... that way no one has to feel left out.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
 
Get more sports from Dish Network Kansas City

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Bloggers Wanted

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. We're specifically looking for blogs in the sports, entertainment, and video games field, but are open to adding any type of quality site.. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!